Updated: 1 April 2026
Corrections Policy — British Casino
Accuracy matters to a comparison site built around operator transparency, so we maintain a clear process for reviewing and correcting errors. This page sets out what counts as a reportable error, what we need from you, and how we decide on any change. Its relevance to British Casino is considered through operator transparency and local eligibility.
What counts as a reportable error
A reportable error is a factual statement that is demonstrably wrong at the time you read it: an incorrect bonus figure, a lapsed licence reference, a wrong wagering requirement, or an outdated eligibility note are typical examples worth flagging. The local reading for British Casino gives priority to operator transparency and local eligibility.
Give us the exact URL and evidence
Always include the precise page address rather than a general site reference, along with a description or screenshot of the disputed content and, ideally, a link to the source that contradicts it. This lets us reproduce what you saw and compare it against our records. For the British Casino comparison, the editorial lens is operator transparency and local eligibility.
How we check sources
Where possible we compare disputed claims against the operator's own published terms, licensing register entries, or other publicly verifiable sources before making any change. We do not amend pages on the strength of an unverified claim alone. This matters in the British Casino context when considering operator transparency and local eligibility.
Material changes versus minor changes
A material change affects a reader's understanding of eligibility, cost, or risk, such as a wrong deposit limit or an incorrect licensing statement, and is prioritised accordingly. A minor change, such as a typo or a stylistic slip, is corrected in ordinary course without any formal notice. This matters in the British Casino context when considering operator transparency and local eligibility.
Dating our corrections
Where a material correction is made, we note the date it was actioned so readers can see when the page last changed in a way that affects its substance. The editorial context for British Casino places this detail beside operator transparency and local eligibility.
Temporary publication states
While an investigation is ongoing, a page may carry a temporary note, be adjusted pending confirmation, or in rare cases be withdrawn from publication until the position is clear. This is a precaution rather than a conclusion. The practical emphasis for British Casino stays on operator transparency and local eligibility.
When a report is not upheld
Not every report results in a change. If our checks show the original content was accurate, or the disputed point is a matter of interpretation rather than fact, we will explain why no correction has been made. Its relevance to British Casino is considered through operator transparency and local eligibility.
Supported criticism and editorial opinion
Ratings, rankings and editorial commentary reflect our assessment and are clearly presented as such. We correct factual errors underlying an opinion, but a reasoned editorial judgement, properly disclosed, is not itself a factual error. The editorial context for British Casino places this detail beside operator transparency and local eligibility.
Urgent or security-related reports
If your report concerns something urgent, such as a live security risk to readers or evidence of a scam being presented on our pages, please mark it clearly as urgent so it can be prioritised over routine corrections. The British Casino comparison keeps operator transparency and local eligibility in view.
Personal casino disputes are handled elsewhere
This process exists to correct our published content, not to resolve individual account, bonus or withdrawal disputes with an operator. Those matters must be taken up directly with the casino concerned and, if needed, its licensing authority. The editorial context for British Casino places this detail beside operator transparency and local eligibility.
Privacy during the correction process
Only share the information necessary to investigate the point raised. Avoid including sensitive personal or financial data in a correction report, since it is not needed to assess a factual claim about our content. For the British Casino comparison, the editorial lens is operator transparency and local eligibility.
Our process in brief
A report is logged, checked against available sources, assessed for materiality, and then either actioned with a dated update, addressed through a temporary note, or closed with an explanation. There is no fixed timetable, as thoroughness takes priority over speed. For the British Casino comparison, the editorial lens is operator transparency and local eligibility.
Submit a correction
Use the correction form below to submit your report with the details described above, and our editorial team will assess it against these principles. The editorial context for British Casino places this detail beside operator transparency and local eligibility.